What you would otherwise use

Six comparisons, written to be useful rather than flattering. One tells you to keep the product you already have. One opens by admitting the competitor is cheaper than RosterSafe and always will be. In a market of a few hundred firms who all talk to each other, a comparison you could catch me overstating is worth less than no comparison at all.

All six comparisons checked

  • RosterSafe vs Modio Health

    At 20 providers: Quote only, no published price

    The closest product to mine, and the one worth comparing against properly. Modio is payer-aware, SOC 2 Type 2 certified, and rated 4.9 out of 5 by its users. It also publishes no price, is not built around serving many client practices, and its own reviewers report a fixed 60-day alert window and no notification on a missed task.

    Read the comparison

  • Already using MedTrainer?

    At 20 providers: Quote only, flat annual rate

    Not really a choice between two products. MedTrainer is a compliance suite whose learning and policy modules I do not compete with at all, and whose credentialing module its own five-star reviewers call the weak part. If that is your situation, keep MedTrainer and run RosterSafe alongside it.

    Read the comparison

  • RosterSafe vs Medallion

    At 20 providers: Quote only, scoped per engagement

    Barely a comparison, because Medallion is an NCQA-certified CVO that does the credentialing for you, while RosterSafe is software that watches the clock. It also names RCM firms as a segment it serves, so the question is size rather than fit: their floor is an enterprise engagement, RosterSafe starts at one provider.

    Read the comparison

  • RosterSafe vs Credentialli

    At 20 providers: Quote only, plus onboarding from $999

    The closest comparison here, and the hardest to write. Credentialli is credentialing software rather than a service, and it names billing companies as a buyer on its own site. The differences come down to a published price, no setup fee, and how much of the product assumes many client practices.

    Read the comparison

  • RosterSafe vs CredyApp

    At 20 providers: Listed at $22 per user seat

    The one where I lose on price and say so first. CredyApp bills per staff seat rather than per provider, which makes it far cheaper at any real roster size. Worth reading for the billing-unit argument rather than a feature count.

    Read the comparison

  • RosterSafe vs a spreadsheet

    At 20 providers: Free

    The honest comparison, because a spreadsheet is what almost every firm this size actually uses. It is free, familiar, and infinitely flexible. It also has no alarm, and it is unreadable to anyone but the person who built it.

    Read the comparison

For reference, RosterSafe at 20 providers is $500 per month, published on the pricing page with no form to fill in.

Who I am not trying to beat

Being clear about this is part of the product. If you are one of the following, another vendor will serve you better and I would rather you knew now.

  • A hospital or health system. You need clinical privileging, OPPE and FPPE, and committee voting workflows. I have deliberately not built any of them. symplr and CredentialStream are built for you.
  • A solo or two-provider practice. At that size an outsourced credentialing service usually costs less in real terms than any tool plus your own time.
  • A firm that wants the work done for them. RosterSafe is software, not a credentialing service. I do not submit applications, chase payers, or make calls on your behalf. If you want done-for-you, you want a CVO, and several vendors here (Modio and Medallion among them) run that service alongside their software.
  • A payer or digital health platform needing an API. CertifyOS and Verifiable are built for engineering teams. I do not have a public API yet.

Still here?

Then you are probably the firm I built this for. Take the free test drive on a single provider before you decide anything.

Get Started Free