The map
| What expires | How often | Who sets it | What a lapse costs |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAQH re-attestation | Every 120 days | CAQH | The profile reads as not attested. Payers that pull from it stop treating the data as current, and an application already in flight can stall without anyone being told. |
| Payer enrollment (re-credentialing) | At least every 36 months, per payer | The payer, to NCQA standards | Claims to that payer deny. The provider stays billable to every other payer, which is what makes a lapse easy to miss: revenue dips rather than stops. |
| State license | Set by each state board, and by profession | State licensing board | The provider cannot practice. Every payer enrollment resting on that license is affected at once. |
| DEA registration | Every 3 years | DEA, under 21 CFR 1301.13 | No controlled-substance prescribing. Separate registration per state of practice. |
| Malpractice cover | The policy's own term, commonly a year | The carrier | Primary-source verified at re-credentialing, so an expired certificate can hold up a cycle that had nothing else wrong with it. |
| Medicare revalidation | Every 5 years, or every 3 for DMEPOS suppliers | CMS, under 42 CFR Part 424 Subpart P | Billing privileges can be deactivated. This is a separate clock from any commercial payer and it is easy to lose because five years is longer than most people keep a spreadsheet. |
| Medicaid revalidation | At intervals not exceeding 5 years, 3 for DME | Each state Medicaid program, to a CMS ceiling | Enrollment can be terminated, per state. Fifty programs means fifty sets of mechanics on top of one federal ceiling. |
| Board certification | Historically 10 years, increasingly 5, and varying by board | The individual ABMS member board | Not always billable-critical, but payers ask for it and some contracts require it. The cadence is the problem: there is no single answer across 24 member boards. |
| Exclusion screening | Monthly | OIG guidance, plus each state Medicaid program | Not an expiry at all, which is why it is missed. It is a check that has to be re-run, against lists that change underneath a roster that did not. |
Why they never line up
Each clock starts when its own paperwork was last completed, not on a date anybody chose. A provider credentialed in March re-attests in July; one credentialed in April re-attests in August. Multiply that by every provider on the roster and the calendar has no shape at all.
A firm holding twenty providers across a dozen client practices is therefore carrying somewhere near a hundred and twenty separate dates before a single payer enrollment is counted. That is the arithmetic that breaks a spreadsheet: not the number of rows, but that every row has its own unrelated timetable and no two of them can be checked together.
The ones that catch people out
CAQH runs on 120 days, and Illinois does not
The standard cycle is 120 days. Illinois runs 180 under state law, so a firm working across state lines is running two cadences on one profile type. The CAQH ProView quick reference is the primary document; the Illinois exception is described by HireGaynell and SybridMD, both of which are credentialing services rather than neutral parties.
A payer lapse is one payer, not all of them
NCQA sets re-credentialing at at least every 36 months, per payer, each on the date that provider was last approved by that payer. So a lapse takes out one payer's claims while the rest keep paying. Revenue dips instead of stopping, which is why these are routinely found by a denial rather than by a calendar.
DEA is three years, and it is per state of practice
The registration cycle is three years under 21 CFR 1301.13. A provider practising in two states holds two registrations with two dates. Renew late and prescribing stops, whatever the license says.
Board certification has no single cadence any more
The traditional cycle was ten years. Several boards have moved to five, some replaced the single decennial exam with small recurring online assessments, and some ask diplomates to attest in years 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 of a ten-year cycle. In 2026 the program itself was renamed from Maintenance of Certification to Continuing Certification. The ABMS member-board directory is where each board’s current rule lives, and the American Board of Anesthesiology’s move to five years is a worked example of the shift.
For a firm this is the awkward one, because there is nothing to look up once. Twenty-four member boards means the answer depends on the provider’s specialty, and it has been changing.
Exclusion screening is not an expiry
Nothing on the provider's record runs out. The federal list changes monthly and the roster has to be re-checked against it, which is a different shape of task from everything else on this page and the reason it falls off calendars built for renewals. We publish the cost-of-lapse calculator for the money side of this; the screening side is a standing monthly job, not a date.
It is also not one list. The federal picture is OIG-LEIE plus SAM.gov, and most state Medicaid programs publish their own exclusion list on their own schedule and in their own format. A provider clear federally can be excluded by a state you bill in, so the monthly job is really as many checks as there are lists that touch your book.
Government enrollments are the ones people lose
Medicare revalidation runs on a five-year cycle for most providers and three for DMEPOS suppliers, set by 42 CFR Part 424 Subpart P and described on CMS’s own revalidation page. State Medicaid programs revalidate at intervals not exceeding five years, three for DME, to the same federal ceiling.
Five years is the problem. It is longer than most spreadsheets survive, longer than most staff stay in a role, and long enough that the person who filed the original enrollment has usually moved on. CMS also reserves the right to request revalidation off-cycle, so the date you recorded is a floor rather than a promise.
One provider’s year, as it actually falls
Take a physician credentialed in March, licensed in one state, prescribing controlled substances, enrolled with Medicare and fifteen commercial payers.
- March. Credentialed. Every clock below starts on a different date from this one.
- July. First CAQH re-attestation falls due, 120 days on.
- Every month, all year. Exclusion screening against a list that changed since last month.
- November. Second re-attestation. Nothing else has happened yet, which is what makes the year feel quiet.
- Somewhere in year two or three. Malpractice renews on the policy term. The state board wants a renewal on its own cycle. Neither is aligned to anything else.
- Year three. DEA. Also the earliest a commercial payer re-credentials, and each of the fifteen has its own date.
- Year five. Medicare revalidation, by which point three of the dates above have rolled twice.
Nothing in that list is difficult. The difficulty is that it is one provider, and a firm at twenty providers is running twenty non-overlapping copies of it.
The practice that actually works
Credentialing specialists who publish on this converge on one habit: never work to the deadline itself. Set the internal trigger at 90 days against CAQH’s 120, so there are 30 days of slack to chase a malpractice certificate or a license renewal that is still in the post. The advice comes from HireGaynell, a credentialing service, and it matches what the enrollment timelines make necessary: restoring a lapsed payer enrollment takes 90 to 120 days, so anything found on the day it lapses is already months from being fixed.
What we do and do not do about it
RosterSafe tracks these dates across every provider and client practice on one timeline, and tells you before they pass. That is the whole product.
It does not file anything, does not attest on your behalf, and does not discharge your responsibility for your own deadlines. We are deliberately not a credentials verification organization: the firm keeps control, the margin, and the client relationship. If what you want is for somebody else to do the work, an outsourced service is the right purchase and we are not it.
Sources
Every figure above links to where it comes from. Several of those links are credentialing companies, which are vendors in this category and in some cases competitors of ours. They are cited because they publish the clearest public statements of these cycles, not because they are disinterested. Where a primary document exists, it is linked first.
Cycles change. This page carries the date it was last checked, and if you find something here that has gone stale, tell me and I will fix it.